<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="http://newsaxon.org/forum/european-history/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<title>Latest threads in: European History</title>
		<link>http://newsaxon.org/forum/rss/forum_43/</link>
		<description>Latest threads on: New Saxon</description>
		<item>
			<title>The history of antisemitism</title>
			<link>http://newsaxon.org/forum/european-history-43/the-history-of-antisemitism/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<b>One of my blogs, <i>'The Traitor Within,'</i> </b>([url=http://traitor666.blogspot.co.uk/]THE TRAITOR WITHIN[/url]) <b>contains a section titled, <i>'The Jewish Question'.</i> </b><br /><br />The truths that are told within it are markedly <i>'antisemitic.'</i> It contains an edition of <i>'The Protocols,'</i> for example. Of the various essays within this section of the blog only one appears to have upset the powers-that-be enough to tinker with it. Yesterday when I went to get the link none of the four<i> 'History of antisemitism' </i>essays were there and, when I tried to reinitroduce them, the process was not straightforward.<br /><br />For now, the essays are back in place. Whilst they are still up, you may want to take a look at what upset the oppo enough to delete them.<br /><br /><b>The history of antisemitism:</b> (part 1)<br /><br />[url=http://traitor666.blogspot.co.uk/2006/09/the-history-of-antisemitism.html]THE TRAITOR WITHIN: The history of antisemitism[/url]]]></description>
			<guid>http://newsaxon.org/forum/european-history-43/the-history-of-antisemitism/</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 08:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>ironwand</dc:creator>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>10,000 to 40,000 bc European history / Sumeria</title>
			<link>http://newsaxon.org/forum/european-history-43/10-000-to-40-000-bc-european-history-sumeria/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I am currently researching archeological evidence that shows cro-magnon man came into Europe starting at around 40,000 bc with radiocarbon dating and the last cro-magnons coming to Europe in 10,000 bc but also to the Americas at the last migration around 10,000 bc. This shows that we Europeans did not come out of Africa but came into Europe from the west and moved east. I have also done research on the Sumerians and the interesting history they left on tablets. I have found that scholars in linguistics have been able to prove that the Nordic languages are derived from the Sumerian language and alphabet. So as it has been proven that cro-magnons/Europeans established Sumeria and many of the other ancient middle eastern countries through skeletal analysis of the remains of the people and genetic testing. I know that the NAZI belief was that we all came from Thule Ultima and a cataclysmic event occurred. Then there were the 2 nations of Atlantis and Hyperborea, we all know that the story of Atlantis that it sank. With Hyperborea i am having a hard time finding any hints of its existence other than the NAZI belief that Sumeria was Hyperborea and the people of hyperborea split half going north to the now nordic states. With the other half going to under the Himalayas which is why the SS sent a few expeditions there. So what i am wondering is if any one else has come to the same findings or if i am just way off. Any sources/books to research with information would be greatly appreciated or any of your findings would be great to compare with.<br /><br />currently using Dr. Francois Bordes as a source and this website i have found to be<br />very reliable through all the sources used. <br />http://www.atlantisquest.com/Anthropology.html]]></description>
			<guid>http://newsaxon.org/forum/european-history-43/10-000-to-40-000-bc-european-history-sumeria/</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 02:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Dirk Lienger</dc:creator>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>What do you know about Portugal?</title>
			<link>http://newsaxon.org/forum/european-history-43/what-do-you-know-about-portugal/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XXw5fMIYGqg<br /><br />The first and last Global Empire in history.]]></description>
			<guid>http://newsaxon.org/forum/european-history-43/what-do-you-know-about-portugal/</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 18:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Lusitano</dc:creator>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>German Propaganda Archives</title>
			<link>http://newsaxon.org/forum/european-history-43/german-propaganda-archives/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Found this great website that has some rare but valuable  Third Reich documents and pamphlets. Here's a great example:<br />http://www.calvin.edu/academic/cas/gpa/haken32.htm<br /><br /><br />Background: This widely distributed Nazi pamphlet first appeared in 1929. I am working from a 1932 copy, and have not compared it with the first version, but it does not look as if significant changes were made as it was reissued. The title, loosely translated, is &#8220;Those Damned Nazis.&#8221; Literally, it translates as something like &#8220;those cursed swastika lads,&#8221; but that does not really work in English. At least several hundred thousand copies were printed. It is a good summary of the basic lines of Nazi propaganda just before Hitler&#8217;s takeover in 1933. The booklet included five cartoons by Mj&#246;lnir, Goebbels&#8217; cartoonist, three of which I include here. Mj&#246;lnir also produced some of the most familiar Nazi posters. The source: Nachdenken (Munich: Verlag Frz. Eher, 1932). Those Damned Nazis by Joseph Goebbels Why We are nationalists because we see the nation as the only way to bring all the forces of the nation together to preserve and improve our existence and the conditions under which we live. The nation is the organic union of a people to protect its life. To be national is to affirm this union in word and deed. To be national has nothing to do with a form of government or a symbol. It is an affirmation of things, not forms. Forms can change, their content remains. If form and content agree, then the nationalist affirms both. If they conflict, the nationalist fights for the content and against the form. One may not put the symbo above the content. If that happens, the battle is on the wrong field and one&#8217;s strength is lost in formalism. The real aim of nationalism, the nation, is lost. That is how things are today in Germany. Nationalism has turned into bourgeois patriotism and its defenders are battling windmills. One says Germany and means the monarchy. Another proclaims freedom and means Black-White-Red [the colors of the German flag]. Would our situation today be any different if we replaced the republic with a monarchy and flew the black-white-red flag? The colony would have different wallpaper, but its nature, its content, would stay the same. Indeed, things would be even worse, for a facade that conceals the facts dissipates the forces today fighting against slavery.]]></description>
			<guid>http://newsaxon.org/forum/european-history-43/german-propaganda-archives/</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 12:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>alpenjaeger</dc:creator>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Free access to Civil War records</title>
			<link>http://newsaxon.org/forum/european-history-43/free-access-to-civil-war-records/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Ancestry.com is&nbsp; having a free access week starting April 7 -14, 2011. Also available is the 1860-1870 US census records. <br mce_bogus="1"></p>]]></description>
			<guid>http://newsaxon.org/forum/european-history-43/free-access-to-civil-war-records/</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 15:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>WarriorQueen</dc:creator>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Fichte's Address to the German Nation 2]]></title>
			<link>http://newsaxon.org/forum/european-history-43/fichte-39-s-address-to-the-german-nation-2/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><span title="Apple-style-span" title="font-family: verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 9.16667px; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 1px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 1px; "><p title="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: medium; "><i>Johann Gottlieb Fichte (1762&#173;1814) was a German philosopher, a reformer and a supporter of the French Revolution and its ideals. But when France, under Napoleon, took control of Germany along with much of the rest of Europe, he rethought his position and made series of&nbsp;</i>Addresses to the German Nation&nbsp;<i>(1806), in French&#173;occupied Berlin. One of the most influencial philosophers of the 19th century, Fichte's addresses were essential to the evolution of Nationalism and no doubt contributed to the Idealism of the Third Reich. The echoes of these addresses can often be found in both Mein Kampf and Hitler's speeches. While it's no surprise that these addresses are rarely read and often ignored by the academic and cultural establishment in contemporary Germany, it's a great shame that these are not utilized by the Nationalist circles.</i></p><div><br></div><div><blockquote title="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px; font-size: medium; "><p>Love that is truly love, and not a mere transitory lust, never clings to what is transient; only in the eternal does it awaken and become kindled, and there alone does it rest. Man is not able to love even himself unless he conceives himself as eternal; apart from that he cannot even respect, much less approve, of himself. Still less can he love anything outside himself without taking it up into the eternity of his faith and of his soul and binding it thereto. He who does not first regard himself as eternal has in him no love of any kind, and, moreover, cannot love a fatherland, a thing which for him does not exist. He who regards his invisible life as eternal, but not his visible life as similarly eternal, may perhaps have a heaven and therein a fatherland, but here below he has no fatherland, for this, too, is regarded only in the image of eternity---eternity visible and made sensuous, and for this reason also he is unable to love his fatherland. If none has been handed down to such a man, he is to be pitied. But he to whom a fatherland has been handed down, and in whose soul heaven and earth, visible and invisible meet and mingle, and thus, and only thus, create a true and enduring heaven---such a man fights to the last drop of his blood to hand on the precious possession unimpaired to his posterity.</p><p>Hence, the noble-minded man will be active and effective, and will sacrifice himself for his people. Life merely as such, the mere continuance of changing existence, has in any case never had any value for him, he has wished for it only as the source of what is permanent. But this permanence is promised to him only by the continuous and independent existence of his nation. In order to save his nation he must be ready even to die that it may live, and that he may live in it the only life for which he has ever wished.</p><p>So it has always been, although it has not always been expressed in such general terms and so clearly as we express it here. What inspired the men of noble mind among the Romans, whose frame of mind and way of thinking still live and breathe among us in their works of art, to struggles and sacrifices, to patience and endurance for the fatherland? They themselves express it often and distinctly. It was their firm belief in the eternal continuance of their&nbsp;<i>Roma</i>, and their confident expectation that they themselves would eternally continue to live in this eternity in the stream of time. In so far as this belief was well-founded, and they themselves would have comprehended it if they had been entirely clear in their own minds, it did not deceive them. To this very day there still lives in our midst what was truly eternal in their eternal Roma. . . .</p><p>In this belief in our earliest common forefathers, the original stock of the new culture, the Germans, as the Romans called them, bravely resisted the oncoming world dominion of the Romans. Did they not have before their eyes the greater brilliance of the Roman provinces next to them and the more refined enjoyments in those provinces, to say nothing of laws and judges<font face="WP TypographicSymbols">=</font>&nbsp;seats and lictors<font face="WP TypographicSymbols">=</font>&nbsp;axes and fasces in superfluity? Were not the Romans willing enough to let them share in all these blessings? In the case of several of their own princes, who did no more than intimate that war against such benefactors of mankind was rebellion, did they not experience proofs of the belauded Roman clemency? To those who submitted the Romans gave marks of distinction in the form of kingly titles, high commands in their armies, and Roman fillets; and if they were driven out by their countrymen, did not the Romans provide for them a place of refuge and a means of subsistence in their colonies? Had they no appreciation of the advantages of Roman civilization, of the superior organization of their armies, in which even Arminius did not disdain to learn the trade of war? Their descendants, as soon as they could do so without losing their freedom, even assimilated Roman culture, so far as this was possible without losing their individuality.</p><p>Freedom to them meant just this: remaining Germans and continuing to settle their own affairs, independently and in accordance with the original spirit of their race, going on with their development in accordance with the same spirit, and propagating this independence in their posterity. All those blessings which the Romans offered them meant slavery to them because then they would have to become something that was not German, they would have to become half-Roman. They assumed as a matter of course that every man would rather die than become half a Roman, and that a true German could only want to live in order to be, and to remain, just a German and to bring up his children as Germans.</p><p>They did not all die; they did not see slavery; they bequeathed freedom to their children. It is their unyielding resistance which the whole modern world has to thank for being what it now is. Had the Romans succeeded in bringing them also under the yoke and in destroying them as a nation, which the Romans did in every case, the whole development of the human race would have taken a different course, a course that one cannot think would have been more satisfactory. It is they whom we must thank---we, the immediate heirs of their soil, their language, and their way of thinking---for being Germans still, for being still borne along on the stream of original and independent life. It is they whom we must thank for everything that we have been as a nation since those days, and to them we shall be indebted for everything that we shall be in the future, unless things come to an end with us now and the last drop of blood inherited from them has dried up in our veins. To them the other branches of the race, whom we now look upon as foreigners, but who by descent from them are our brothers, are indebted for their very existence. When our ancestors triumphed over&nbsp;<i>Roma</i>&nbsp;the eternal, not one of all these peoples was in existence, but the possibility of their existence in the future was won for them in the same fight. . . .</p><p>&nbsp;</p></blockquote><hr title="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px; font-size: medium; "><blockquote title="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px; font-size: medium; "><p><strong>Source:</strong></p><p>From: Johann Gottlieb Fichte,&nbsp;<i>Addresses to the German Nation</i>, trans. R. F. Jones &amp; G. H. Turnbull (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1922), pp. 136-138, 143-145</p><div><br></div></blockquote></div></span></p>]]></description>
			<guid>http://newsaxon.org/forum/european-history-43/fichte-39-s-address-to-the-german-nation-2/</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2011 04:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>alpenjaeger</dc:creator>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Fichte's Address to the German Nation 1]]></title>
			<link>http://newsaxon.org/forum/european-history-43/fichte-39-s-address-to-the-german-nation-1/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><p title="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: medium; "><i>Johann Gottlieb Fichte (1762&#173;1814) was a German philosopher, a reformer and a supporter of the French Revolution and its ideals. But when France, under Napoleon, took control of Germany along with much of the rest of Europe, he rethought his position and made series of&nbsp;</i>Addresses to the German Nation&nbsp;<i>(1806), in French&#173;occupied Berlin. One of the most influencial philosophers of the 19th century, Fichte's addresses were essential to the evolution of Nationalism and no doubt contributed to the Idealism of the Third Reich. The echoes of these addresses can often be found in both Mein Kampf and Hitler's speeches. While it's no surprise that these addresses are rarely read and often ignored by the academic and cultural establishment in contemporary Germany, it's a great shame that these are not utilized by the Nationalist circles.</i></p><p title="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: medium; "><br></p><p title="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: medium; "><br></p><p title="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: medium; ">The first, original, and truly natural boundaries of states are beyond doubt their internal boundaries. Those who speak the same language are joined to each other by a multitude of invisible bonds by nature herself, long before any human art begins; they understand each other and have the power of continuing to make themselves understood more and more clearly; they belong together and are by nature one and an inseparable whole. Such a whole, if it wishes to absorb and mingle with itself any other people of different descent and language, cannot do so without itself becoming confused, in the beginning at any rate, and violently disturbing the even progress of its culture. From this internal boundary, which is drawn by the spiritual nature of man himself, the marking of the external boundary by dwelling place results as a consequence; and in the natural view of things it is not because men dwell between certain mountains and rivers that they are a people, but, on the contrary, men dwell together-and, if their luck has so arranged it, are protected by rivers and mountains-because they were a people already by a law of nature which is much higher.</p><p title="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: medium; ">Thus was the German nation placed-sufficiently united within itself by a common language and a common way of thinking, and sharply enough severed from the other peoples-in the middle of Europe, as a wall to divide races not akin ....</p><p title="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: medium; ">That things should remain thus did not suit the selfishness of foreign countries, whose calculations did not look more than one moment ahead. They found German bravery useful in waging their wars and German hands useful to snatch the booty from their rivals. A means had to be found to attain this end, and foreign cunning won an easy victory over German ingenuousness and lack of suspicion. It was foreign countries which first made use of the division of mind produced by religious disputes in Germany-Germany, which presented on a small scale the features of Christian Europe as a whole-foreign countries, I say, made use of these disputes to break up the close inner unity of Germany into separate and disconnected parts....</p><p title="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: medium; ">. . . They knew how to present each of these separate states that had thus arisen in the lap of the one nation-which had no enemy except those foreign countries themselves, and no concern except the common one of setting itself with united strength against their seductive craft and cunning-foreign countries, I say, knew how to present each of these states to the others as a natural enemy, against which each state must be perpetually on its guard. On the other hand, they knew how to make themselves appear to the German states as natural allies against the danger threatening them from their own countrymen-as allies with whom alone they would themselves stand or fall, and whose enterprises they must in turn support with all their might. It was only because of this artificial bond that all the disputes which might arise about any matter whatever in the Old World or the New became disputes of the German races in their relation to each other. Every war, no matter what its cause, had to be fought out on German soil and with German blood; every disturbance of the balance had to be adjusted in that nation to which the whole fountainhead of such relationships was unknown; and the German states, whose separate existence was in itself contrary to all nature and reason, were compelled, in order that they might count for something, to act as makeweightsl to the chief forces in the scale of the European equilibrium, whose movement they followed blindly and without any will of their own. Just as in many states abroad the citizens are designated as belonging to this or that foreign party, or voting for this or that foreign alliance, but no name is found for those who belong to the party of their own country, so it was with the Germans; for long enough they belonged only to some foreign party or other, and one seldom came across a man who supported the party of the Germans and was of the opinion that this country ought to make an alliance with itself.</p><p title="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: medium; ">Now, at last, let us be bold enough to look at the deceptive vision of a universal monarchy, which people are beginning to hold up for public veneration in place of that equilibrium which for some time has been growing more and more preposterous, and let us perceive how hateful and contrary to reason that vision is. Spiritual nature was able to present the essence of humanity in extremely diverse gradations in individuals and in individuality as a whole, in peoples. Only when each people, left to itself, develops and forms itself in accordance with its own peculiar quality, and only when in every people each individual develops himself in accordance with that common quality, as well as in accordance with his own peculiar quality-then, and then only, does the manifestation of divinity appear in its true mirror as it ought to be; and only a man who either entirely lacks the notion of the rule of law and divine order, or else is an obdurate enemy thereto, could take upon himself to want to interfere with that law, which is the highest law in the spiritual world! Only in the invisible qualities of nations, which are hidden from their own eyes-qualities as the means whereby these nations remain in touch with the source of original life-only therein is to be found the guarantee of their present and future worth, virtue, and merit. If these qualities are dulled by admixture and worn away by friction, the flatness that results will bring about a separation from spiritual nature, and this in its turn will cause all men to~be fused together in their uniform and collective destruction.<br></p><p title="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: medium; ">Johann Gottlieb Fichte, Thirteenth Address,&nbsp;<i>Addresses&nbsp;</i>to the Gerrnan Nation, ed. George A. Kelly (New York: Harper Torch Books, 1968), pp. 190&#173;91,193&#173;94,197&#173;98.<br></p><p><font title="Apple-style-span" face="'Times New Roman'" size="3"><br></font></p></p>]]></description>
			<guid>http://newsaxon.org/forum/european-history-43/fichte-39-s-address-to-the-german-nation-1/</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2011 04:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>alpenjaeger</dc:creator>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>We are all Germanic/Viking  blood</title>
			<link>http://newsaxon.org/forum/european-history-43/we-are-all-germanic-viking-blood/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p title=""><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proto-Celtic" title="Proto-Celtic">Proto-Celtic</a>  culture formed in the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iron_Age" title="Iron Age">Early Iron Age</a> (1200 BC-400 AD) in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_Europe" title="Central  Europe">Central Europe</a> (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hallstatt_culture" title="Hallstatt  culture">Hallstatt</a> period, named for the site in present-day  Austria).&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angles)&nbsp; and &nbsp; &nbsp; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saxons &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; <font size="3">WE are all cou</font><img src="http://newsaxon.org/file/smile/biggrin.gif" mce_src="http://newsaxon.org/file/smile/biggrin.gif" alt="" phpfox="image-protect"><font size="3">sins.</font> </p>]]></description>
			<guid>http://newsaxon.org/forum/european-history-43/we-are-all-germanic-viking-blood/</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 17:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Dane101</dc:creator>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>WHITE HISTORY</title>
			<link>http://newsaxon.org/forum/european-history-43/white-history/</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<i><a href="WHITE-HISTORY.COM" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">WHITE HISTORY</a><br>[link='ERECTUSWALKSAMONGST.US'</a></i>]]></description>
			<guid>http://newsaxon.org/forum/european-history-43/white-history/</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 05:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Robert1the4bruce</dc:creator>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>