| Total Views: 373 - Total Replies: 21 |
|
|
ExNavyGal wrote:
I feel the same way, and if I ever met a man who could fill those shoes, I would sell out to him without hesitation. They are really hard to come by nowadays.
|
That's the crux of the matter, right there. The cult of feminism has ruined the generation of men currently facing their mid 30s and those younger. However, I have seen a backlash against feminism in a minority of women my age and younger. It's encouraging. They watched their mothers being miserable trying to compete with men, and have decided they want fulfillment, not false promises of equality. Hopefully, many of the current crop of young white men will overcome the programming of the feminist cult, and seek out women who want a partnership as nature intended. |
| Back To Top |
|
|
belligerent_claimant wrote:
|
ExNavyGal wrote:
The only thing I have a problem with is the mention of "submission" and "dominance". I know what you mean by this I "think", but I am also afraid that when those words come into play in a relationship, there is high risk for the man to become abusive, emotionally and perhaps physically to not only his wife but children as well. This is a stereotype that plagues men who are white nationalists I am afraid to say. I believe this stereotype has evolved due to misunderstanding with the language used in this particular dialogue. When we talk about traditional values, I think of strong men, supportive women, and well behaved children, with all mentioned also being respectful to those who deserve respect. I do NOT think of dominance and submission. If I were to marry a good strong, dedicated, hard working man who is loving, respectful, understanding, and confidant, then I would bend every way till Tuesday to do everything in my power [of my own will] to please him in every way possible. and keep a good women. There will never be a need to dominate her or make her submit, or discipline her. That whole scenario just sounds sick to me. Honestly.
|
I must disagree. There is nothing in the simple act of identifying a power dynamic in a relationship that contributes to violence. Put simply, dominance and submission is a dance requiring exactly two partners. Ask any man how easy it is to be the boss of someone who doesn't give two licks whether he is fulfilled in their relationship. They will tell you it just doesn't work. A woman has to want to submit; she has to believe it is the natural order of the world that a man should have the decision making power in a family. A woman can be a competent, capable, and assertive person in her own right. The fact that she chooses to submit to one man, her husband, does not in any way diminish her. The fact that her husband has the power in making decisions does not in any way mean that her opinions are not valid, or valued. A man would be a fool to not consult with his wife as part of his decision making process on big matters. After all, he married a strong, confident woman, one he respects for her intellect. He did not choose a doormat who had nothing between her ears. Even those who might disagree philosphically with male dominance have to realize that the dynamic allows for an efficiency in the family that is impossible in a "family democracy". Management by committee is inefficient at best, and dangerous to the family's success at the worst. A dominant male should not be confused one who is domineering, callous, abusive, or a some kind of misogynist. He is simply one who hasn't been watered down by the cult of feminism; in fact, he remains strong, wise, and the most competent to lead his family. And while it is a minority of women who will admit this- I will. I want a joyous, loving, and respectful relationship where the man is in charge because he should be. So fine: I am a sellout to the male establishment, and proud of it.
|
*APPLAUSE* This is EXACTLY how I feel and I am sick and tired of being blacklisted from all the white nationalist sites because of it! |
| Back To Top |
|
| POSTED BY: Othala on 08/03/2009 01:41:03 |
|
To answer the part of the question left out of many responses... Diet and excersize are key to a sharp mind and a strong body. This is every aryan's duty. I am lucky to live in a predominantly white area, though it gets a little darker each day. When it comes to my diet choices I try to buy as much local food as possible, usually around 80%-90% or so of my total shopping. This accomplishes many things. 1) Fresher, healthier food 2) Local food generally requires more preparation, this gives my daughter time in the kitchen learning (and admittedly my son, who loves to cook) 3) Fresh, local produce and meat is harvested and grown (at least around here) by white farmers, who pay white employees 4) I`m not giving my money away to another country who may employ illegal immigrant farm hands. 5) It helps to teach pride in your community to my kids who want to know why we don`t buy pineapple. It`s better for them to understand how their actions affect the white community, than it is for them to hear "It's n-i-g-g-e-r fruit". To throw my two cents in on the rest... I am the head of my household, on that there is no debate... but I wouldn't be the strong, proud man I am without my wife. She is an invaluable asset to our family, and an excellent role model for my children, specifically my daughter. I've read, understood and appreciated all the other comments, but at the end of the day, I tend not to think about such things. I suppose I'm lucky and I just "have it", but there is no thought in my family as to domination, submission, ruling or discipline. It just is, and it's perfect. :) |
| Back To Top |
|
|
|
