NSM Policy on American Indians?
#1 May 8, 05:28
NSM Policy on American Indians?

I would like to know what the policy is. I will follow it, but this is what I feel:

The Natives fought wars, and had a warrior tradition.  They made lousy slaves and would rather die.  Many of them fought with honor.

Today, they are a scattered and broken people, and I do not feel that they represent a threat to White Nationalism. I honor the fallen warriors of the past.

I look on living Indians with stern pity.  They are lazy, and often drunkards, and they seem to lack intelligence.  Still, they have with their casinos and reservations shown that the 'Noble Savage' reputation of the past is not wholly myth, they have self governing reservation authorities and share casino profits socially, in a way that I think is somewhat of a model.

Disease and alcohol has destroyed the Indians, and they have never fully recovered.  I see them as an appropriate example of benevolence on our part; to pity them, give them seperate lands, and try to honor the treaties our fathers made with them as much as reason allows.

Any Comments?

In transition, ice, water, vapor.
#2 May 8, 08:48

I'll comment.  A once friend of mine introduced me to his wife, and her father. Her father claimed to have indian in his bloodline. Looking at him you wouldn't see the indian for miles, if he has indian heritage. His features are mostly northern European, light sky blue eyes, fair skinned. He's an ex Klan member in the days when david duke was younger, and in his ralley days. Anyways he's retired now. Getting old he still supports the issues that are not being consulted properly these days like Illegal immagration, white minority, etc. I'd say for people that are in this position they might be some what honorable, but you still have to think about purity, and who will see eye to eye with you as on kindreth basis. Most people tend to want to follow the given laws of Hitlers mein kampf. Some people fear that exceptence of distant, but kindreth blood is necessary for the movement.. I guess it all depends on whether or not it is the necessity of Aryan will to servive. But as i told another individual this yesterday, Hitler once stated that "Making an alliance should not be done other then to wage war"! This could mean a very uncomfortable potsition for people of like minded, that fear they might become the slaughter after a war! Reasons to believe this is the way he stated to "lie until they believe it". Then using people like Russia to make treaties, and wage war, only to turn the battle on them. Wich in this case it is understandable. The russians had the Bolshevist issue, they raided Germany prior to all this muckluck. So you can only back up to the point of " Good Conduct" and hope that this, and trust is good enough to wage a war, and in the end stand as brothers, without futher ethnic cleancing. 14/88

Oh by the way, i'm not an NSM member, but i thought it was worth posting to, and no i'm ot speaking from an anti tunge. I just feel people read these things like others, and buzzle them together. So i hope i wasn't posting unwelcomed.

#3 May 8, 17:22

For the record, I am certainly not advocating acceptance of mixed blood lines, nor do I have any mixed blood.

In transition, ice, water, vapor.
#4 July 1, 21:19
Racial greetings to all reading this, and hail to you for your efforts towards the cause of White racial preservation and advancement. This is actually an area I haven't gotten to extensively research yet. However, I have done some. To any that may posses any lingering form of guilt (or question), I add the following excerpt from THE COMPACT HISTORY OF THE INDIAN WARS by John Tebbel. What follows is an account from a battle between the forces of Major General Arthur St. Clair, and the forces of Little Turtle ( Ohio Valley, 1790):
"In that frenzy of victory the Indians inflicted on the luckless captives every species of cruelty that savage ingenuity could devise. They danced and howled at the screams of prisoners roasting at the stake; they pulled out men's intestines bit by bit; they flayed others alive and slowly hacked or wrenched limbs away. They dashed out the brains of children against the trunks of trees and flung their battered bodies into the brush. Some of the women were stretched naked on the ground and run through with wooden stakes; others were cut in two after their breasts had been hacked away."
"Posterity will not remember those who pursued their own individual interests but it will praise heroes who renounced their own happiness." Adolf Hitler
#5 July 1, 21:33
Additionally, the romanticized version of the beautiful, peaceful Indian that lived in harmony with nature is merely hogpiss propaganda ("crimes of the White man") generated by our enemies and sympathizers as yet another strategy to create "white guilt", and undermine our greatness. The so-called great tribal nations of "Native Americans" were formed as confederations of tribes. More often than not,this was due to the stronger tribes conquering and subjugating the weaker tribes. Often the weaker tribes were decimated, and the few remaining were assimilated into the stronger tribe. "Native American" history is a lengthy saga of bloody, brutal, and ruthless tribal warfare. They were anything but peaceful, and were it not for the intervention of Whites (and consequent legal system), they would be slaughtering each other to this day.
"Posterity will not remember those who pursued their own individual interests but it will praise heroes who renounced their own happiness." Adolf Hitler
#6 July 4, 18:44
Hailsa kinsman! And I'd like to say I appreciate your response, as meaningful dialogue is always productive and educational. However, I must in good faith add a thing or two. First of all, I merely added some things for food for thought. Some of which to address the enemy propaganda that is oh-so-often used to perpetuate "white guilt", which the great Commander Rockwell clearly stated is "...the master stroke of the enemy", and as you yourself should know has had devastating consequences on our Folk. Secondly, at no time did I say anything about civilization, nor indicate that the "Native Americans" were not warriors, or worthy adversaries. Just making a few points. I've encountered far too many Whites that posses a disproportionate degree of guilt over "what we did to the Indians". In all actuality, they, like other non-white races have cultural traits that are admirable. But I refuse to be consumed with guilt and regret over what our ancestors did. I truly feel worse over the endless fratricidal warfare our very own ancestors perpetuated against each other. I actually envy the "native" population as they have enjoyed far more success in keeping their indigenous religious traditions intact, then we have. Thanks again to the judeo-christian alien creed. As you obviously are aware of KINSMAN, the great Folk re-awakening is at hand and the spear of Wotan flies freely again. Because of this, we will emerge victorious.
"Posterity will not remember those who pursued their own individual interests but it will praise heroes who renounced their own happiness." Adolf Hitler
#7 July 5, 05:45
This was never their land in the first place, we've always lived in America even before the "Indians" got here. Our Ancestors were here a very long time ago, but the Asian "Indians" came over on an Ice-bridge from Asia to good ole America. We've got all kinds of artifacts in places like New Mexico and others that proves we were here before them also.
14/83
#8 July 7, 01:37
The Chinese are in the pocket of Jews and they'll never let them take anything over without them approving of it first. If they try anything I'm sure Israel would nuke them in a heart beat.
14/83
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:20.