I would like to know what the policy is. I will follow it, but this is what I feel:
The Natives fought wars, and had a warrior tradition. They made lousy slaves and would rather die. Many of them fought with honor.
Today, they are a scattered and broken people, and I do not feel that they represent a threat to White Nationalism. I honor the fallen warriors of the past.
I look on living Indians with stern pity. They are lazy, and often drunkards, and they seem to lack intelligence. Still, they have with their casinos and reservations shown that the 'Noble Savage' reputation of the past is not wholly myth, they have self governing reservation authorities and share casino profits socially, in a way that I think is somewhat of a model.
Disease and alcohol has destroyed the Indians, and they have never fully recovered. I see them as an appropriate example of benevolence on our part; to pity them, give them seperate lands, and try to honor the treaties our fathers made with them as much as reason allows.
I'll comment. A once friend of mine introduced me to his wife, and her father. Her father claimed to have indian in his bloodline. Looking at him you wouldn't see the indian for miles, if he has indian heritage. His features are mostly northern European, light sky blue eyes, fair skinned. He's an ex Klan member in the days when david duke was younger, and in his ralley days. Anyways he's retired now. Getting old he still supports the issues that are not being consulted properly these days like Illegal immagration, white minority, etc. I'd say for people that are in this position they might be some what honorable, but you still have to think about purity, and who will see eye to eye with you as on kindreth basis. Most people tend to want to follow the given laws of Hitlers mein kampf. Some people fear that exceptence of distant, but kindreth blood is necessary for the movement.. I guess it all depends on whether or not it is the necessity of Aryan will to servive. But as i told another individual this yesterday, Hitler once stated that "Making an alliance should not be done other then to wage war"! This could mean a very uncomfortable potsition for people of like minded, that fear they might become the slaughter after a war! Reasons to believe this is the way he stated to "lie until they believe it". Then using people like Russia to make treaties, and wage war, only to turn the battle on them. Wich in this case it is understandable. The russians had the Bolshevist issue, they raided Germany prior to all this muckluck. So you can only back up to the point of " Good Conduct" and hope that this, and trust is good enough to wage a war, and in the end stand as brothers, without futher ethnic cleancing. 14/88
Oh by the way, i'm not an NSM member, but i thought it was worth posting to, and no i'm ot speaking from an anti tunge. I just feel people read these things like others, and buzzle them together. So i hope i wasn't posting unwelcomed.
For the record, I am certainly not advocating acceptance of mixed blood lines, nor do I have any mixed blood.
"In that frenzy of victory the Indians inflicted on the luckless captives every species of cruelty that savage ingenuity could devise. They danced and howled at the screams of prisoners roasting at the stake; they pulled out men's intestines bit by bit; they flayed others alive and slowly hacked or wrenched limbs away. They dashed out the brains of children against the trunks of trees and flung their battered bodies into the brush. Some of the women were stretched naked on the ground and run through with wooden stakes; others were cut in two after their breasts had been hacked away."