Racism antiblanc
Aspects of racism antiblanc
The attacks descriptive 2-1
The demonization 2-1-1
2-1-2 Widespread
The 2-1-3 "laundry"
The 2-1-4 slander and falsehood racist
2-2 The attack Physics and présentielle
The segregation 2-2-1 Verbale
2-2-2 Obstruction of passage
The insult 2-2-3 Racist
The coup of 2-2-2 hairdresser
2-2-3 Attacks: Tandem and racist aggression "free"
2-3 Psychological Aggression
The racial 2-3-1 Blackmail
2-3-2 Reverse culpabilisantes
2-3-3 The refusal of Parole
The refusal 2-3-4 listening
2.1. The attacks descriptive
The descriptive attacks are to give an image depreciated peoples, nations or types of minorities in Europe. They contribute to the strengthening of the great myths of racism Antiblanc.
They encourage European ethnic groups to turn away from their origins, their history, their cultures and other individuals of their ethnic group. They aim to provoke not a loss, but a voluntary abandonment of identity. Their goal is to push the peoples of Europe to abdicate their sovereignty, their institutions and their rights to grant an over-proportionate to crops and representatives of other ethnic groups.
The negative image plummeted and they impose create a climate conducive to inter-ethnic crimes and racially motivated crimes committed at the expense of whites.
2.1.1. The demonization
The demonization is the most frequent and most constant attacks descriptive. She settled in time. This method is through the use of Selective Silence, by constant repetition of certain facts and distortion or omission of certain others, to give a negative impression of a European-style or European ethnic groups, make objects opprobres to justify certain behaviour prejudicial to them. It inculcates racist stereotypes on the peoples of Europe. It prepares the ground on which develops racism Antiblanc. The method of demonizing the most frequently used at the expense of whites is to present constantly racists in the guise of a person by ethnic European strain, which promotes the transition to the widespread (often the idea that all whites are racist And that only they are racist).
2.1.2. Widespread
The generalization is to take the individual the most despicable of a white population and to designate as typical of this population, and his crime as a result of a character trait inherent to its people.
2.1.3. The "laundry" and "Good Excuse"
The laundry is to shift the responsibility of a problem, or commit a crime by the people of a non-Western countries, by an ethnic minority or one of its members, in a Western country, this group an ethnic population or a nation of European type. This form of manifestation of racism Antiblanc based on the myths of the omnipotence of racism and specific.
The Good Excuse is the method of inversion culpabilités which is to justify behaviour or racist remarks of a person by the loss of real or perceived ethnic group whose son was the victim on the part of whites.
2.1.4. The slander and lies racist
The racist slander is to present a false derogatory to the image of a white or, as a truth
2.2. The attack and physical présentielle
This list five steps can measure the degree of racism antiblanc in a community. The incidents of stage one and stage two must be reported to social actors in the neighbourhood where they occurred. By the third stage, when the antiblanc racism manifests itself openly, there is an emergency and life White is really in danger, all such incidents should be reported to the police and be a complaint.
2.2.1. Segregation verbale
The word segregation is a form of exclusion commonly practised in groups in which whites are a minority, but in an environment where they remain the majority. In France, this situation is increasingly common, because of increased migration flows and demographic factors, but also because the demonization of white incite the youngest among them to assimilate to ethnic groups whose identity and culture are presented as more rewarding than the ethnic group consistently described as "racist". The word segregation is also very present in the workplace and public spaces.
In such cases, although all are proficient in the language of the local culture, members of the dominant ethnic group addressed to each other in a language that the victim does not understand. Because a common language is mastered by all, this behavior is to conceal, to isolate, to reject and to exclude. This is a marked difference in status in the group. Segregation verbal aims to establish a hierarchy based on ethnic and cultural everyone in a group where some, by their inability to understand and control everything that happens, are not full participants. The word means segregation forever, voluntarily or not, a devaluation of the victim. It purports to exclude on the basis of cultural or ethnic affiliation: it is a form of racism.
2.2.3. "The obstruction of passage."
"The obstruction of passage" which is in the unsaid, is one of intimidation the more traditional racists antiblanc. It is for the racist when he is certain to have a physical advantage or where it is a group to set deliberately across the road a white, forcing him to make a detour, under penalty risk of physical violence. It imposes a balance of power in which the white victim is put in a situation of inferiority physical and psychological, it loses control of the situation it faces.
2.2.3. The racist insult.
The openly racist insult is a type of aggression which can take many forms. It may be a "White Sale", a "dirty from" a "Ham", a "blondin", a "dirty French", a "toubab", a "chalk face", ect, ect.
The racist insult can take subtle forms. Thus a white will deal with "Sale racist" for not acting according to the wishes of a person belonging to another ethnic group. In this case, the racist Antiblanc considers that the person they insult is unable, by its nature of "White", to think as a human being and to bring an objective judgement.
Sometimes, insult manifests itself by using a tone of voice aggressive or derogatory, we feel a hostile attitude and nothing comes explain the behaviour of the person we have in front of itself, except that it does not like white.
Often, the insult is known as an occasional but it can also become the most visible expression of a genuine bullying, which will continue day after day.
2.2.4. "The coup of the hairdresser"
This specific practice of racism antiblanc is to take a lock of hair, go to see any hand in a white hair or a white, without worrying about what is the victim. More white or white are typed, meaning they have more hair, the more they are exposed. D'anondine appearance, the coup of the hairdresser mark an escalation in racist violence directed against whites. Here the white or white are physically taken by the party racist, because of their physical appearance. The victim is reduced to the status of an object, deprived of its status as a human being and racism establishes a ratio of more than inferior to his victim, he "chosifie."
"The coup of the hairdresser" is one of the most degrading practices - and most widely-racism antiblanc. This is the last step before the changeover to the violent act against whites.
2.2.5. Attacks: Tandem racist attacks and free.
The physical assault of white racist motives is extremely common but very few documented for several reasons. First, because people who are born "white" have never been educated in the belief that their skin color just make them victims and sometimes difficult to identify a racist behaviour which they are the target, secondly because they are not encouraged to lodge complaints, finally what they are being culpabilisantes inversions.
Often, the racist crime Antiblanc hiding in the guise of another offence. The inter-ethnic crimes are often subjected to racist blunders. That is the principle of racist tandem: the aggression "classical" added a racist attack. In such cases, the victim is chosen not only as a target for theft, rape or a scam, but also because she has white skin or other physical characteristics attributed to the peoples of Europe.
The racist attack is accompanied by signs immediately identifiable by the victim:
The victim is white, or equivalent to this ethnic group
A group of aggressor is ethnically homogeneous, or excluding white (he) s.
The insults, comments or speeches specific racism antiblanc are proffered.
(Where appropriate) assailant (s) use (s) methods similar to Blackmail Racial.
In these early signs, others may be taken into account:
In the past, the aggressor has openly expressed hostility toward white (he) s.
Although he had the opportunity to attack victims of other ethnic groups, all victims of an aggressor are white (he) s, or equivalent.
The aggressor has home of music or literature inciting racial hatred (eg Rap hate Ministry as Amer, Sniper, The Brigade and Lunatic or Islamist literature) ...
The aggressor has already committed in the past, attacks against the racist white (he) s
The aggressor has demonstrated an unusual violence.
Often, attacks against the racist white (he) s are described as "gratuitous attacks." Dissipons here this myth: a free aggression, it does not exist. An assault is always a reason; when (e) white (he) is attacking "without reason" by people who are not his ethnic group, racism antiblanc is, obviously, the reason for the aggression.
In situations openly racist attacks or tandem racist, racist aggressor will play on the great prejudice to give an alibi for his behavior. It will therefore adopt a speech that it was not him who is "racist", but his victim. In this context, an accusation as "you do not like the…", uttered by the racist antiblanc must be understood as, "I do not like white." Racists Antiblancs often lend their victims to their personal feelings.
Sometimes, the racist who assaulted a White did not realize that his act is a crime of racial hatred. The myth of racism specific, reinforced by a constant demonization of whites and ethnic groups by the Grand Prejudice, gives the feeling of being "defend" as a member of a group "oppressed". In his mind, white is already guilty and deserves to be attacked. The myth of "silver spoon" also gives the racist feel that his act is not really harmful to his victim white.
The daily described as white racists, particularly in relation to specific ethnic groups, is a factor that promotes the transition to the offence at some youth belonging to other ethnic groups when the victim is white.
The racist attacks, repeated and systematic, sometimes lead to situations similar to ethnic cleansing; White local populations, harassed, leave a given geographical area. In such cases, a reversal of culpabilités, they are accused of having created Ghettos.
2.3. The attack psychological
2.3.1. The racial blackmail
Making racial blackmail is play the card of the colour of skin.
The racial blackmail is to move on the ground of racism any conflict, any litigation in which a member of another ethnic group, when confronted with a blank, did not prevail. In this case, the racist Antiblanc plays on the myth of racism and specifically on the Grand Prejudice. It tries to push his victim to justify or prove that it is not adopting a racist behaviour conforms to the wishes of the slanderer.
This method of racism Antiblanc psychological aggression is the most common suffered by whites, as members of a specific ethnic group. All the whites who live in contact with other ethnic groups will have to suffer several times during their social and professional life.
The racial blackmail is deeply rooted in the myth of innate racism, but he also gets married to reverse culpabilisante and racist insult. The racial blackmail draws its strength from the morality of his victim and, as paradoxical as it may seem, a white will be more vulnerable to blackmail race that will be sensitive to the problems of other ethnic groups. The racial blackmail is to play on the goodwill of whites for profit. In such a context, each concession at the height racist appeals invariably another.
For a white, in an inter-ethnic, hear used phrases like "you tell me that because I am…" "I made it because I am…" should always be an alarm signal.
We must never give any credit to an individual is not known and which, at the outset, plays the card of the colour of skin.
It is unfortunate that in our country, some anti-racist associations have made a racial blackmail method militant.
2.3.2. Reverse culpabilisantes
Reverse culpabilisantes are probably the reasons why, today, racism Antiblanc is so widespread and so little documented. They are to give responsibility for an act of hatred Antiblanc on the shoulders of the victim rather than those of racist.
The displacement of suspicion
The displacement of suspicion is a typical consequence of the myth of racism specific whites. Just as we suspected a woman rape victim to have provoked his assailant by a particular behavior, thereby justifying the criminal behavior, we immediately asked the victim of racism Antiblanc if it has not had a behaviour that would have provoked his attackers, even though she did nothing special.
The displacement of suspicion is also the result of the myth of the spoon money for people who practice it is difficult to believe that a white can be a victim of a racist attack simply because of his skin colour. This is a consequence of the demonization of selective silence and the Grand Prejudice.
The offence of generalization.
From the moment that will point out that white was the victim of an incident involving members of another ethnic group (see The tandem racist), he asked not to generalize, noting that because the aggressors are of a different ethnic group, this person enters the field of racism. Out in this area, the Grand Prejudice is that the aggressor is always white. In other words, because she was the victim of racism Antiblanc, the victim is suspected of racism, by the very act of telling details of the aggression, it confirms his guilt.
THE isolation accuser
In our Western societies, there are some accusations that are worth an immediate rejection of those accused. Paedophilia is one, for a white, racism is another. The strength of Grand Prejudice, the constant demonization against ethnic whites are such that in all situations of conflict between a white and a person belonging to another ethnic group, there is always two diametrically opposed reactions, even before the we know who is wrong and who is right: The White deviate from the scene, holding their congener "Already convicted," fearing to go for "racist" and exposed to racist violence perpetrators. Among individuals belonging to ethnic groups, however, the ethnic solidarity takes precedence and they immediately assembled and immediately adopt an attitude of "aggressive defence" vis-à-vis white.
The reason for this behavior, already referred to under the heading "Blackmail racial," is that most whites feel much less comfortable than other ethnic groups in the field of racism.
The isolation in which the person white victim of a racist act alone is enough to confirm his guilt. Most often, this person, even if it shows clearly that it is victim - one is tempted, by reflex, to say "innocent" - will not be quite disculpée without the "moral" of a member of another ethnic group, preferably that of the aggressor.
It should be noted that for a white man accused of racism, it is extremely difficult to exonerate: The very fact that he has friends belonging to other ethnic groups will be interpreted as further proof of its supposed racism. We acknowledge that White then have, according to the scenario, or "… service". In the perverse logic of racist Antiblanc, the very fact that a white is not racist proves it is! In fact it is important to understand is that a white, what to do, will always be too white in the eyes of racist antiblanc.
The Selective Silence.
The Selective Silence is a transposition of the offence of generalization in the social sphere and political. It imposes silence on certain facts, historical or current, whose revelation is considered detrimental to the image of one or more ethnic groups identified as "victim by nature". In general, we invoke the possibility that the evocation of these facts make the game of extreme right and fanned the flames of racism Blanc. This approach uses the argument of racism as a specific justification.
By cons, systematically include all incidents in which a white committed a racist act, under the pretext that racism against other ethnic groups must be denounced.
The selective silence produced the opposite result from what it claims to want to get. There is increasing bitterness of the victims of racism Antiblanc or inter-ethnic crimes, while it confirms members of other ethnic groups in the idea that they are unique targets of racism. This represented a unique sense of racism constantly reinforces the illusion of reality of racism specific White: The selective silence is one of the main weapons used to demonize whites.
2.3.3. The refusal of Parole
For the refusal of speech, racist Antiblanc refuse a white right to speak on the problem of racism, or disqualified in advance the point of view, because the latter does not fully understand the seriousness of the topic, do not suffer as much as others. In other cases, it will signal its ethnic origins and prejudice suffered by its people to suggest that his words have more weight than those of his interlocutors whites.
Very often, racist Antiblanc believes that the physical differences, religious or cultural differences that distinguish a white are the equivalent of a doctorate which would provide lessons to others. Just as often, he is convinced that his difference vaccine against human stupidity. The refusal of speech is a racist practice that is rooted in the belief the myth of the silver spoon. This agreement implies that a White does not have sufficient intelligence to understand and speak some problems in some areas.
The refusal of speech is a subtle way for the racist Antiblanc, not calling into question his own racial prejudices. This practice allows him to continue to perceive themselves as a victim of racism in situations where it is - and the refusal of the floor shows - a racist actively engaged in a process of discrimination and racial hatred against others.
The refusal to return the floor Blanc in the camp of the aggressor. Indeed, if there is racism, there is necessarily racist and his victim. If white can not be the victim, then it is necessarily the aggressor. Prisoner of this logic, the white is not racist or unwilling to spend racist, is obliged to act and speak in accordance with the wishes of racist Antiblanc, while questioning the positions of returning the white racist in the camp of the aggressor. It takes everything that this logic was perverse, and the benefits that may derive racist.
The refusal of speech seals the process culpabilisant. The white, identified as racist, is unable to make its voice heard and to exonerate, ie call into question the stereotypes of the aggressor. He had no other choice to identify with the suffering of only racist, to join his point of view, and access to his desires in the hope that goodwill will be recognized. It is of course entirely unnecessary because of the racist belief is based on the FIB, the latter HAIT whites and that, therefore, nothing ever meet. In this context perverse, goodwill white, contrary to rise further proof of his guilt.
Nowadays, the refusal of speech often takes the form of a certain anti-racist discourse.
The typical sentence for refusing to speak, is the famous "you can not understand because you're not…"
2.3.4. The refusal to listen
The refusal to listen is another method racists Antiblancs to refuse to address or discuss the problem of racism Antiblanc. Again, this is to allocate white in the camp of the aggressor. From the moment that will raise the issue of racism Antiblanc, the interlocutor will systematically divert speech stating a fact known about the racism of white against other ethnic groups. The goal is to push the white to justify, to prove he is not racist, by abandoning the speech in which he puts into question the behaviour of individuals belonging to other ethnic groups. The refusal to listen is also a bluff that is to believe that denouncing racism Antiblanc, it denies the existence of racism of some whites.
Once again, we find the great myths of racism Antiblanc in these practices. Racism Antiblanc would not deserve that attention because it is less harmful to its victims (myth of the silver spoon), but it was more important to talk about the racism of whites, because this one is more marked than that of other peoples (myth of racism specific).
Of course, the refusal to listen is often combined with the refusal of speech, his group is typical verbal "Yes but 'must not forget that whites have done…."
