Blogs

cleansebyfire

Hitler’s sister speaks out in defense of her brother

The following is a statement made by Paula Hitler in 1957, repeating 
her conviction expressed 12 years earlier following the death of her 
beloved brother.  In it she addresses a new generation of German 
politicians and critics of the 
Führer, as she compares his greatness 
with their contemptible insignificance and unworthiness.


Gentlemen!  Remember this: Your names will long be forgotten 
even before your bodies have rotted away in the Earth.  But the 
name Adolf Hitler will still be a light in the darkness.  You cannot 
murder him by drowning his memory in your vomit-buckets, and 
you cannot strangle him with your filthy, ink-stained fingers.  His 
name exists forever in hundreds of thousands of souls.  You are 
entirely too insignificant to even touch him. 

He loved Germany; he lived for Germany.  When he fought for honor 
and respect, he fought for German honor, for respect for Germany; 
and when there was nothing left, he gave his life for Germany. 

What have you given thus far?  Which one of you would give his life 
for Germany?  The only things you care about are riches, power and 
never-ending luxurious living.  When you think of Germany, you think 
of indulging your senses withhout responsibility, without cares.

Trust me on this:  The Führer’s utter selflessness in word and deed 
alone guarantees his immortality.  The fact that the bitter fight for 
Germany’s greatness was not crowned with success like, for example, 
Cromwell’s in Britain, has a lot to do with the mentality of the people 
involved.  On the one hand, the Englishman¹s character is essentially 
unfair, ruled by jealousy, self-importance and a lack of consideration. 
But he never forgets that he is an Englishman, loyal to his people 
and to his crown.  On the other hand, the German, with his need for 
recognition, is never first and foremost a German. 

Therefore it doesn¹t matter to you, you insignificant creatures, if you 
destroy the entire nation.  The only thought that guides you will 
always be: Me firstMe second
you will never think of the welfare of the nation.  And with such a 
pitiful philosophy you wish to prevent the immortality of a giant? 

What I wrote down immediately after the war has proven to be 
correct. That my convictions are true is evident, even as late as 1957. 

PAULA HITLER
Berchtesgaden, 1st May 1957

Tags: WWII, Adolf, Hitler
cleansebyfire
centralvalleyhammer
The Cake Is Ready....
Posted April 20, 2010 by centralvalleyhammer

I'm normally not big on sweets but April 20 only comes around once a year.

I'd like to take a moment and enjoy a big slice with all of my friends and comrades.

Here's to us, Here's to the future, Here's to der Führer!

88 and to all a blessed 4-20 for years to come.

AWSAlabamaTedR
Pierce
Posted April 15, 2010 by AWSAlabamaTedR

Hi, I am almost finished reading this book

The Fame of a Dead Man's Deeds: An Up-Close Portrait of White Nationalist William Pierce

I think every white person should read it, it has some of everything,

including- Hitler- John Birch- George Lincoln Rockwell- Savitri Devi-

National Alliance- Turner Diaries- Cosmotheism- Bob Matthews-

Hunter- The fate of millions of Germans at the end of WWII-

the jews-


Well, William Pierce admits he was not a "people person" and I am

not always impressed with his dvds, but he is a great thinker and

writer, he brings an almost all-encompassing crystal clarity which I

think our movement needs.


The other thing I am thinking about lately is I hope we in the movement

can put aside our religious differences, I myself can accept any religion that is not

Zionist or radical Islamic. Good luck to the NSM in LA! Hail victory!

AWSAlabamaTedR
our race under attack
Posted March 29, 2010 by AWSAlabamaTedR

I send this to show that the

white race is under attack, that extermination of our race
is being planned and implemented.

Hitler as Philosophe: Remnants of the Enlightenment in

National Socialism, by Lawrence Birken, 1995, Hardcover.

Reviewed by Mark Weber

Hitler as Enlightenment Intellectual: The Enduring Allure

of Hitlerism

A specter is haunting the world -- the specter of

Hitlerism. That, in short, is the stern warning of this

provocative book, written by an Assistant Professor of

History at Ball State University (Indiana), and published

by Praeger, a leading US academic publisher.

In spite of decades of vehement vilification, says author

Lawrence Birken, Hitler's views have enduring and

dangerous appeal -- not because they are bizarre and

alien, but precisely because they are rational and well

grounded in Western thought. In particular, Birken

stresses, Hitlerism is firmly rooted in the rationalist

and scientific outlook of the 18th-century European

Enlightenment. This is not meant as a compliment, however;

the author is hostile to the West and its traditions.

Rejecting the American and Western historical legacy,

Prof. Birken openly calls for a new, racially homogenized

America.

For more than half a century, Hitler and his views have

been ceaselessly demonized in motion pictures, on

television and in the print media. And yet, according to

Birken, the appeal of Hitlerism remains so potent that it

threatens the ideal of a racially "redefined" America of

"higher unity." As traditional standards and long-

established cultural, racial and religious values come

under ever greater attack, and as this country's racial

and cultural crisis becomes ever more acute, Birken fears

that those who are unwilling to accept the "redefined"

society that is developing in America and Europe will turn

in ever greater numbers to Hitler's alternative vision of

society. Hitlerism, Birken says, will loom ever larger as

a dangerously seductive "siren song."

'A Genuine Intellectual'

Scholars and others have made a major mistake in failing

to take Hitler seriously as a thinker, argues Birken, who

believes that the German political leader "must be

regarded as a genuine intellectual" on a par with Karl

Marx and Sigmund Freud. Birken's assessment is not as

startling as many might believe. As he notes, as early as

1953, British historian Hugh R. Trevor-Roper "evoked the

image of Hitler as a kind of synthesis of Spengler and

Napoleon, noting that of all world conquerors the German

leader had been the most 'philosophical'..." More

recently, German historian Rainer Zitelmann established in

a study of impressive scholarship that Hitler's outlook

was rational, self-consistent and "modern."

Although he is endlessly castigated as "the most notorious

racist of the twentieth century," Hitler's racial views

were actually quite in harmony with mainstream 19th- and

early 20th-century European thinking. "It should be

obvious," writes Birken, "that Hitler possessed a

'classical' theory of race which dovetailed nicely with

his classical notions of political economy."

Far from being aberrant or bizarre, his views on race were

consistent with those of most prominent Westerners in the

decades before the Second World War. And while Birken does

not specifically mention it, Hitler's racial views were

comparable to those of Thomas Jefferson, Theodore

Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson and Winston Churchill.

It is "of course, a great mistake to see anti-Semitism as

a rejection of Enlightenment values," writes Birken. "On

the contrary, the Enlightenment simply secularized rather

than destroyed traditional Judeophobia." (No Western

thinker was more outspokenly anti-Jewish than Voltaire,

the great French philosophe, who regarded the Jews as

"enemies of mankind.")

Hitler's attitude toward the United States was mixed. He

saw much to admire in 18th- and 19th-century America, and

as Birken notes, he praised this country's pre-1940s pro-

White racial policies, its restrictions on non-White

immigration, and its pioneering adoption of eugenics

measures.

But Hitler also saw ominous trends during the 1920s and

1930s. Echoing the views of American industrialist Henry

Ford, he was dismayed by the spectacular growth of Jewish

power and cultural influence, and regarded Franklin

Roosevelt's "New Deal" administration as a virtual

revolution in American life, through which Jews largely

usurped the country's traditional ruling class.

The defeat of Germany in 1945, Birken rightly notes,

"clearly marked a watershed" in world history, and

especially for the West:

    In a real sense, Hitler's defeat implicitly became the

defeat of the European nation-state and the Enlightenment

values that underpinned it. Germany's heirs, the United

States and the Soviet Union, were both fundamentally

transnational, multiracial empires whose territories were

seemingly unlimited.

As a result, for half a century we have been living in

what Birken calls a "consumer capitalist" world in which

"the hierarchical order of sex and race which had

originally sustained bourgeois nationalism has been

disintegrating" and in which "the increasing

relativization of values is encouraged by the ever greater

globalization of the economy and consequent emergence of a

multinational business elite."

This new world order is less durable than it might appear,

says Birken. The recent collapse of the multi-ethnic,

multi-racial Soviet Union, he warns, portends similar

problems for the American empire. Even a mere contraction

of the economy could threaten "to dissolve the United

States into several races." In Birken's view, racial

nationalism threatens "the continued existence of the

United States." He warns:

    What Hitler said in the thirties is thus what our

racial nationalists are saying today: namely, that a

genuinely inclusive multiracial nation violates the

natural order of things. The United States must either be

a white-dominated state or a collection of breakaway

republics made up of this or that group.

In short: if Hitler was right, America is an increasingly

unnatural and artificial construct that does not deserve

to survive, and will not survive.

Birken fears that Hitlerism will become ever more

attractive to those who reject today's supra-national

"consumer capitalism," and who resist the rapidly emerging

"genuinely inclusive multiracial" order. This alternative

vision has appeal beyond America and Europe, Birken

believes. As he notes, Hitler's fight against the British

empire -- a war he actually never sought nor wanted --

"won him <Hitler> the admiration of colonial peoples from

Ireland to India ...."

A New 'Cosmic' Nation

Birken concludes his book with a fervent call for "the

gradual formation of an American race as a higher

synthesis. Then the Americans will truly constitute a

universal or 'cosmic' people." In Birken's view, the "race

myth" and Hitlerism "will continue to tempt us" unless

Americans "can be given a genuine metaphysical

foundation." This "metaphysical foundation" must be to

"uncreate race" through massive racial mixing. Therefore,

Birken writes, "we should not be afraid of that dirty

little word, 'miscegenation'." (Consistent with this

vision, President Bill Clinton, in his much-discussed June

14, 1997, speech in San Diego on race relations, openly

proclaimed the goal of making America "the world's first

truly multiracial democracy.")

Given the reluctance of many Americans, particularly

conservative Whites, to warmly embrace this new

"universal" nation, Birken says "we must have an education

system that is able to instill this redefinition of

American culture."

"Before we try uniting the world," Birken concludes, "let

us try uniting ourselves. Until we do so, the siren song

of Hitlerism will call to us."

Stark Alternatives

To anyone who views the past with an open mind, history

demonstrates the utterly fantastic nature of the goal laid

out by Prof. Birken (and President Clinton) -- a vision no

less utopian than Marxian Communism. In any case, to meld

the American population into a "universal" racial-cultural

entity would require government repression on a scale

unimaginable today.

Few Americans today are able or willing to fully grasp the

enormous implications of the radical program that

intellectuals such as Birken (and political leaders such

as Clinton) are spelling out for our future. But once they

do (and as Prof. Birken fears) many will likely turn to

Hitlerism as an alternative to the official prevailing

ideology. The decades-long campaign of vilification of

Hitler and Third Reich Germany may actually contribute to

this by convincing millions of Americans that Hitlerism is

the antithesis of the Establishment's ideology, and thus

the only real alternative.

In spite of its defects, Hitler as Philosophe effectively

dispels some widely held misconceptions about Hitler and

Hitlerism, acknowledges the critical importance of the

race issue, and boldly spells out stark alternatives for

the future of America and Europe. For this the author

deserves credit.

Tags: hitler, race
Displaying 6 to 10 of 20