SundownAvery
Posted July 31, 2011 by SundownAvery in Society
Undogmatic White Nationalism

As is almost universally the case, white nationalist movements and groups combine their core message with philosophies that no longer hold currency with today’s youth. These comprise of social mores that have been shaken off by today’s society. Already fighting a difficult battle in winning the hearts and minds of the white youth over to their side, white nationalists are not only advocating the most unpopular ideology in contemporary Western civilization, but are increasing their repugnance by clinging to the traditions of yesterday.

The uncompromising truth is this: white youths are the most critical adherents nationalism needs to attract, as their choices in whom to reproduce with will decide the future of the white race. The biological mistakes of their elders can be eroded should they consistently bear children with members of their own kind. There should be no higher goal in the movement, and no ideal that hinders this in practice should be given a moment’s consideration.

Henceforth, all white nationalists must strive towards the total and utter accomplishment of these feats before all others:

Primarily, to discourage white youths from developing relationships with those of other races

Secondarily, to discourage white youths from accepting other races as part of their culture and society

Listed below are the beliefs that are conservative, and must be shed in order for the white youth to better relate to the cause:

Abortion Up until now, an unflinching condemnation of abortion has been issued, with the idea that the white race needs every child born to two white parents. However, it is not important (in the short term) to keep the white race as large as possible, but to secure its purity. Despite the low birth rate of whites experienced in recent times, there will still be a base in future years to bounce back from. The rehabilitation of many endangered animal species serve as a testament to this. By shedding pro-life zealotry, and thus relating better to the plight of pregnant teenagers, nationalists can foster greater acceptance among adolescents. From there, they can better persuade the white youth to reproduce only with other members of their kind , and secure the next generation’s purity.

Heterosexuality The LGBT community has been categorically assaulted by white nationalists, with the idea that alternative orientations divert normally procreative heterosexuals to unproductive dead ends. By keeping those tendencies from arising within the white race, nationalists believe they are promoting reproduction. However, it is not at this time clear how the factors of genetics vs. childhood environment dominate each other to determine one’s sexuality, so such ostracism may unnecessarily alienate whites (both within the LGBT crowd and those sympathetic to it) from nationalism. Even LGBT white youths have a role to play by expanding the number of subcultures within the youth (and those sympathetic to individuals within these subcultures) that are accepting of white nationalism. As stated in accordance with abortion, it is not necessary to maximize the reproduction of the white race so long as it is assured that the future generation will be pure.

Family Values White nationalists have unequivocally lobbied for the normalization and even compulsory sustenance of stable nuclear families. Arguing that it is the best way to ensure the propagation of nationalist attitudes, they hold much stock in making divorce nearly or totally impossible, restoring traditional gender roles, and empowering parents as much as possible via policies such as home schooling, for example. However, the products of mainstream society have indicated how powerful popular culture can be against parental guidance. Instilling nationalist beliefs through mass culture in the white youth, who will then go on to craft that same popular culture, will prove far more effective than appointing parents as the revolutionary agents of the white race. Modern day social services have also proved to be aptly competitive against the family in raising a child (or at least determining the content of their psyche) through public education, adoption programs, and other related endeavors. As long as white youths grow up with nationalist outlooks (which extra-familiar entities can easily instill), and will breed accordingly, it is irrelevant what conditions they find themselves in. Since the family is no longer the necessary basic unit from which to extend the reach of white nationalism, ancient gender roles may be forgotten as well. The only utility they have been proven to hold is in the preservation of the family unit itself (whose worth has been discredited), and will only stifle the flow of talent via rigid sexism. Ultimately, the necessity of the family, compared to the abilities of other forces which can do its work, does not warrant the huge reactionary efforts needed to sustain it.


Sexual Conservatism Furious attacks have been levied against promiscuity, pornography, societal openness towards sex, and the increasingly younger ages at which sexual experiences are being had. This has been linked to the support of the family unit, which no longer holds strategic value to the white nationalists. Embracing a sexually liberal platform will popularize white nationalism amongst the youth by recognizing their biological urges, and then sheltering them from the remaining traditionalists who lambast sexual adventurism. Not only that, but it will also heighten the sample size of the naturally occurring percentage of young white couples who choose not to abort the fetus, hence increasing the number of white children being born.


Substance Use There is a considerable portion of the white youth who avoid recreational drugs, and a considerable portion who indulge in said drugs. What is in decline, however, is the portion willing to forcibly prohibit mankind from partaking in such delights. The adoption of a tolerant attitude towards drug, tobacco, and alcohol usage, as well as practicing the charity to effectively rehabilitate addicts rather than punishing them for what they cannot control, will again elevate the cultural relevancy of white nationalists in the eyes of the white youth.


These are the reforms that must be made. The recommendations that have been listed are not the facets of a strict dogma that must be adhered to out of an objective value it possesses in and of itself. They are policies guided by a philosophy of pragmatism: the isolation of the ultimate goal of white nationalism, coupled with a free and practical approach that adapts to current conditions. Should societal values radically transform again in the near future, the nationalists must be ready to evolve in sync. Only then can a future for a whole and conscious white race ever be brought to fruition.
Comments
SundownAvery wrote at September 5, 2011
0 Votes
Solid hate....when you're losing a fight, you can't keep using the same tactics. White race is all that matters
SundownAvery
SundownAvery wrote at September 5, 2011
0 Votes
Are there any of the points i highlighted that you'd be willing to compromise on?
SundownAvery
Big Tobacco wrote at September 3, 2011
0 Votes
Interesting essay. While I can't really say I agree with all of your points, it is really good to see someone give some careful intelligent thought toward broadening the appeal of white nationalism within the white community. Let's face it... as long as white nationalism has the same approximate level of social acceptance as pedophilia, the movement is doomed to fail, and that is precisely what our enemies want.

Unless we expand our self-image beyond uncompromising, brutal, bloodthirsty totalitarianism, we'll never be accepted by the majority of the White nation. Brutal totalitarianism is really a political philosophy favored by, and suited for, lesser races. I agree that it's time to shift our focus to a less dogmatic and more practical approach, with more emphasis on family, heritage and pride than on hate. And dare I say it, even a little bit of compassion (as much as bleeding-heart liberals have made it a dirty word, compassion is really a central virtue of the superior white race which has helped our communities grow strong and united for centuries). If not, then we'll never attract white youth and white women to the movement, and the white race will be further compromised and polluted until it drowns.
Big Tobacco
Alcemist wrote at August 26, 2011
0 Votes
z.o.g. remember mind is allways hollywood jews , music big labels jews , corporates jews ... why usa is only alliance with israel ? it answer all. Now correct influnse and remember that jew try allways make youre choosing , and remembering that thing it is better make hard choises . Like mine is it worth of it , but not .... and situation solved . Final .
Alcemist
✞ SeaWulf 卍 Child ✞ wrote at August 26, 2011
0 Votes
final note:
I'm not saying we should not try to bring these people into racial enlightenment and have them on "our side".. what I AM saying is we absolutely must NOT allow Their enemy influenced "lifestyles", "values"(or lack of), and "primitive" behaviors to become the "norm" within the Movement in order to do it. We cannot say "oh it's "ok" to be an addict, or a homosexual, or sexually promiscuous/irresponsible(male or female) as long as you're on "our side".. because it's NOT "OK". We must Never encourage or promote it. THAT would be, without doubt, our ultimate demise as a race ... for all of the reasons I have already stated (which you have yet to refute). . .just as the our Enemies designed it to be in the first place.
IOW..regarding "your way".. the end -which is questionable to begin with- does NOT justify the means. Not even close.
✞ SeaWulf 卍 Child ✞
✞ SeaWulf 卍 Child ✞ wrote at August 25, 2011
0 Votes
Quote:
We've seen them dismantle our race at an alarming rate for over half a century now
.
EXACTLY!! By getting us to follow -for DECADES now- the very Liberal jewish "progressive" values YOU are promoting..and you want us to EMBRACE the very things they have been using to Destroy us..

But yeah.. ok.. you go for all the "new blood".. all the sick, addicted, diseased and mentally dysfunctional "white blood" (created by 50+ years of YOUR so-called progressive values, mind you) that you want. We'll see how far that gets you..

The white race adapts and survives.. but NOT by wholeheartedly accepting into the Movement the very people that are responsible for putting us in this situation to Begin with..and I'm starting to repeat myself, so yeah.. I'm done.

And I never said or thought you were a dumb@ss btw.. I just think you're wrong.
✞ SeaWulf 卍 Child ✞
SundownAvery wrote at August 24, 2011
0 Votes
Lady, you're basically arguing that a catapult is still a viable weapon in an era of stealth bombers and cruise missiles, at least as an ideological metaphor.

You think I'm a dumbass because I point out that the Jews are winning right now? We've seen them dismantle our race at an alarming rate for over half a century now.

Lady, lemme 'splain something to you. When you're in a war, and your an enemy comes out with a new tactic that costs you battle after battle.....you don't continue doing what you've been doing before. You analyze what your enemy is doing and either copy them or develop an entirely new playbook to suit what your enemy is doing.

And Rohm's only treason was that when Hitler was selling out to the capitalists and the establishment, Rohm and the Strassers were still out vying for the white worker.

I'm glad you're going to stop molesting this thread with your Stegosaurus platform. Now I can try to pick up the new blood for our movement without yesterday's heroes breathing down my neck.
SundownAvery
✞ SeaWulf 卍 Child ✞ wrote at August 24, 2011
0 Votes
Interesting how you use the same tactics as our(?) enemy... repeating the same "out with tradition/in with progressive" drivel ..in a dozen different ways without actually offering any valid argument other than some vague interpretation of history to back it up ...All the while you still blatantly ignore everything I've stated about the Real World consequences of your "ideals". Consequences that BY FAR outweigh ANY supposed benefit to our struggle that your progressive "breed/recruit at all costs" ideals could possibly offer..
I've already pointed out the glaring flaws and inaccuracies in your rhetoric.. So until you can put up a valid rebuttal against any of my points.. I'm done here. I have better things to do that waste my time "conversing" with a broken record.

And yes I know who Rohm was. And like any true liberal, he was greedy and self serving and was eventually Executed for Treason... Probably a Good thing he was given a quick death.. if he was alive "now-a-days" he would more than likely be dying of AIDS.

On that note, here's another bit of Real life info about your buddy Rohm's "lifestyle" for you to mull over.


Before you read the statistics (by the way, most of the statistics are from the government, the same one telling you too accept and treat the gay life style as "normal"), how many gay men are there? Applying figures to the 2003 U.S. population (283 Million), it's around two million (.7% of the U.S. population) <1>.

But since that was 8 years ago, let's just say that it's 2% (yes, I know, I'm giving them some leverage; I more than doubled their estimated population). Keep this small population in mind as you read the staggering disproportionate statistics:


In 2006, MSM (Men who have sex with men) accounted for more than half (53%) of all new HIV infections in the United States, and MSM with a history of injection drug use (MSM-IDU) accounted for an additional 4% of new infections. At the end of 2006, more than half (53%) of all people living with HIV in the United States were MSM or MSM-IDU. Since the beginning of the US epidemic, MSM have consistently represented the largest percentage of persons diagnosed with AIDS and persons with an AIDS diagnosis who have died. <2>

In 2007, MSM were 44 to 86 times as likely to be diagnosed with HIV compared with other men, and 40 to 77 times as likely as women. <2>

While CDC estimates that MSM account for just 4 percent of the U.S. male population aged 13 and older, the rate of new HIV diagnoses among MSM in the U.S. is more than 44 times that of other men (range: 522–989 per 100,000 MSM vs. 12 per 100,000 other men). <3>

MSM are the only risk group in the U.S. in which new HIV infections are increasing. While new infections have declined among both heterosexuals and injection drug users, the annual number of new HIV infections among MSM has been steadily increasing since the early 1990s. <3>

AIDS continues to claim the lives of too many MSM. Since the beginning of the epidemic, more than 279,000 MSM with AIDS have died. <3>

Q: Are condoms strong enough for anal intercourse?

The Surgeon General (C. Everett Koop, Surgeon General 1982-1989) has said, "Condoms provide some protection, but anal intercouse is simply too dangerous to practice". Condoms may be more likely to break during anal intercourse than during other types of sex because of the greater amount of friction and other stresses involved. Even if the condom doesn't break, anal intercourse is very risky because it can cause tissue in the rectum to tear and bleed. <4>

In a scholarly article entitled "Health Risks: Homosexuality And Other Practices", written by Michelle A. Cretella (MD) and Philip M. Sutton (PhD, LMFT, LP), it says "the estimated HIV risk with a single sexual exposure through receptive anal intercourse (2%) is 20 times greater than for receptive vaginal intercourse (0.1%)". <5>

In addition, in the abstract of an Internation Conference on AIDS on July 9-14, 2000 it says "Analysis of data from various European and US studies indicates per-act HIV infectivity of receptive anal sex is approx. 20 times greater than vaginal sex". <6>

STD's

Sexually Transmitted Diseases (STDs) have been increasing among gay and bisexual men. Recent increases in syphilis cases have been documented across the country. In 2008, men who have sex with men (MSM) accounted for 63% of cases in the United States. MSM often are diagnosed with other bacterial STDs, including chlamydia and gonorrhea infections. <7>

In 2004, overall median clinic gonorrhea positivity in MSM was 15% (range: 11-17%) at any anatomic site. <8>



References:

<1> www.adherents.com...
<2>http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/msm/index.htm
<3>http://www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/newsroom/docs/fastfacts-msm-final508comp.pdf
<4>Type in the quote. It'll be the first link.
<5>http://www.narth.com/docs/healthrisks.html
<6>http://gateway.nlm.nih.gov/MeetingAbstracts/ma?f=102239436.html
<7>http://cdc.gov/msmhealth/STD.htm
<8>http://www.cdc.gov/std/stats04/msm.htm



This kind of "help"... we DON'T need..

If, as you claim, our very survival truly depended on accepting these dysfunctional and disease ridden "lifestyles".. then we deserve to die out for we are not FIT to survive as a race.
✞ SeaWulf 卍 Child ✞
SundownAvery wrote at August 24, 2011
1 Vote
I've been on vacation so I haven't gotten back to you. Yea, traditional fam thing has its perks. It had its time, and it served our people well while it was relevant.

But the kikes have changed the battlefield today. The majority of our movement is made of rural KKK style conservatives. And we're using conventional tactics against guerilla warfare. Your type is dwindling out, you can't argue about that. The 21st century will devour the old lifestyle without doubt. Time for evolution & innovation.

The Spartans were arguably one of the best, if not the, when it came to molding their citizens. And yet they vanished. Why? Because they were not sexually active enough and their numbers shrank. After a handful of defeats in battle, they retreated from being a player in world affairs. And as a tiny minority, they couldn't help but be assimilated by the Hellenistic world.

Look at the Autonome Nationalisten in Germany, the Netherlands, France, and elsewhere. These guys and girls are experiencing high growth and are making progressively larger impact. They might not be as radical as my blog, but you'd probably consider them hedonists if you got to know them.

Finally....you do know who Ernst Rohm was, right? I mean I'd just hope so since you are on a neo-nazi site. Ernst Rohm was gay. And without him, the Third Reich never would've been built. He got assassinated by an ungrateful Hitler, but his contribution was equally important as Uncle A's. So maybe we should except the help of anyone willing to give it.
SundownAvery
✞ SeaWulf 卍 Child ✞ wrote at August 15, 2011
0 Votes
In light of some of the latest blogs posted, I Just thought I'd add this little tidbit concerning your stance on "embracing" the LGTB "community"..

While homosexuals are only 1-2% of the population, they account for as many as 40% of all child molestations in the U.S. The Journal of the American Medical Association reported:
50 percent of male AIDS victims reported having sex with an adult male by the age of 16.
20 percent of male AIDS victims had sex with an adult male by age 10.
The homosexual movement in the United States has achieved unprecedented power during the past two decades as a result of its dedication to one single cause: The overhauling of Straight America to accept and embrace homosexuality as a normal variation of sexual expression.


And you think it's "GOOD" for our race to accept or even tolerate this...?
✞ SeaWulf 卍 Child ✞
Displaying 1 to 10 of 26